Hot Issues
spacer
The global economy at midyear: How our views have changed
spacer
The biggest global corporations since 1998
spacer
‘Retrospective’ LRBA measures tipped to cause headaches
spacer
Downsizer Super Contribution
spacer
Keep track of how Australia is really ticking over.
spacer
Insights from the 2019 Vanguard / Investment Trends SMSF survey
spacer
What falling interest rates mean for investors
spacer
ATO releases ‘welcome guidance’ on death benefit income streams
spacer
Super growth reducing age pension drawdown
spacer
Big four firm outlines new financial year checklist for SMSFs
spacer
Asset allocation as you age
spacer
Australia - the story goes on.
spacer
Consolidate your super and save
spacer
Critical documentation steps flagged with switching SMSF loans
spacer
Good investment habits versus damaging biases
spacer
Control considerations flagged with death benefit pensions for children
spacer
Interest rate for SMSF loans set to rise under safe harbour terms
spacer
Recession on our mind
spacer
What it will take to close the super gap between men and women
spacer
Australia - How are we going as 2018-19 ends?
spacer
LRBAs, guarantees in need of review after property market falls
spacer
Average age for establishing SMSFs sitting at 48.9: Report
spacer
ATO updates valuation guidelines for pension reporting
spacer
ATO figures show jump in starting balances for SMSFs
spacer
Your personal financial register
spacer
Australia’s $4bn Super blackhole impacting self-employed most
Limited recourse borrowing arrangements - LRBAs

Transfer of loan amounts flagged as vital compliance step for LRBAs

       

 

With greater numbers of SMSFs turning to related-party loans after several banks withdrew from the SMSF lending space, a law firm has stressed the importance of ensuring that an actual transfer of money has taken place.

In an online article, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers explained that, with borrowing options becoming more limited and SMSFs using related-party loans to fund property purchases, it’s vital that SMSF professionals and their clients are undertaking all the necessary compliance steps.

“When it comes to related-party borrowing, the importance of actually transferring the loan amount from the lender to the borrower, or to the vendor at the direction of the borrower, is sometimes overlooked, particularly in the circumstances where the same individual is the vendor, the lender and the fund trustee,” Townsends said.

The law firm cautioned that, if SMSFs are considering these types of transactions, just having formal loan documents noting the arm’s length loan terms may not be sufficient.

“The ATO’s current view is that there needs to be a transfer of money from the lender to the borrower as a necessary feature of a borrowing as referred to in the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993,” it said.

“Journal entries or set-offs do not meet the requirements of a borrowing. The ATO has relied on old rulings in other contexts to distinguish loans from financial accommodation.”

The law firm gave an example of John, the sole member of an SMSF and sole director of the fund’s corporate trustee.

“After seeking financial and tax advice on the benefits of owning a property in his SMSF, John decides to sell his investment property valued at $1 million to his SMSF. As his SMSF’s available balance is $200,000 short of the market value, he will enter into a contract with the SMSF for a loan of $200,000 to fund its purchase using a limited recourse borrowing arrangement,” Townsends explained.

“In lieu of paying the loan amount to the SMSF, he received $800,000 as the vendor from the SMSF on settlement, the $1 million sale price less his ‘loan’ of $200,000 to the fund. But is that $200,000 really a loan?”

Townsends warned that, in this example, John should have actually transferred $200,000 from his personal account to the fund as an advance of the loan amount, and received the whole $1 million on the settlement of the property sale contract. 

“If the transaction is deemed to be an arrangement other than a loan, the LRBA exception under the SIS Act will not apply and this may expose the SMSF trustee to civil or criminal penalties and place the SMSF’s complying status at risk,” it said.

 

Miranda Brownlee
18 April 2019
SMSFadviser.com

 

Pattinson Financial Services Pty Ltd ABN 17 121 851 376 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Infocus Securities Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 47 097 797 049 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 236523

Tel: +61 2 8850 6888 | Fax: +61 2 8850 6407 | Toll Free 1300 466 637 | PO Box 6253 Baulkham Hills BC NSW 2153

site By PlannerWeb