Hot Issues
spacer
SMSFs attract younger members
spacer
Heed restrictions on downsizer contributions
spacer
Access to more resources and tools than most websites.
spacer
Valuations key to avoiding NALI restrictions
spacer
SMSF advice appetite strong, says ASIC
spacer
For a smoother path to investment success, diversify
spacer
How's Australia doing statistically?
spacer
LRBA changes mostly affect Melbourne, Sydney retirees
spacer
Lessons from the 2019 Index Chart
spacer
The global economy at midyear: How our views have changed
spacer
The biggest global corporations since 1998
spacer
‘Retrospective’ LRBA measures tipped to cause headaches
spacer
Downsizer Super Contribution
spacer
Keep track of how Australia is really ticking over.
spacer
Insights from the 2019 Vanguard / Investment Trends SMSF survey
spacer
What falling interest rates mean for investors
spacer
ATO releases ‘welcome guidance’ on death benefit income streams
spacer
Super growth reducing age pension drawdown
spacer
Big four firm outlines new financial year checklist for SMSFs
spacer
Asset allocation as you age
spacer
Australia - the story goes on.
spacer
Consolidate your super and save
spacer
Critical documentation steps flagged with switching SMSF loans
spacer
Good investment habits versus damaging biases
spacer
Control considerations flagged with death benefit pensions for children
spacer
Interest rate for SMSF loans set to rise under safe harbour terms
spacer
Recession on our mind
spacer
What it will take to close the super gap between men and women
spacer
Australia - How are we going as 2018-19 ends?
spacer
LRBAs, guarantees in need of review after property market falls
Control considerations flagged with death benefit pensions for children

When starting retirement phase pension accounts, SMSF professionals and their clients should think carefully about how it might impact the amount of death benefit pension that their children will be able to receive, says a technical expert.

       

 

Australian executor trustees senior technical manager Julie Steed said that, when discussing pensions and estate planning with clients, it’s very important to think about what money will be leaving the super system.

“If we’re going to have excess amounts, do we really want to be holding insurance in super anymore? We may want it outside of super where we can direct it straight through to our estate plans through testamentary discretionary trusts that we can control,” Ms Steed explained at the Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand SMSF Day 2019 Workshop.

“Most parents, when faced with the choice between tax efficiency and control for their adolescent children, will nearly always choose control over tax efficiency.”

Ms Steed said that if the deceased has a transfer balance account at any time prior to their death, then the child death benefit amount will be the child’s share of the retirement phase pension accounts.

“So, if I started a retirement phase pension on 1 July 2017 with $1.6 million, and it’s grown to $2 million by the time I die, and I’ve got a single child, my child can receive $2 million as a death benefit pension, even though that’s $400,000 above the general transfer balance cap,” she explained.

Importantly, the process and formula with the child cap increment, she said, also applies to accumulation accounts.

“This means that my children can have zero amounts out of my accumulation accounts. So, if I’ve got $2 million in pension phase, and $3 million in accumulation phase, and I’ve got two children and they’re getting 50 per cent each, they can each have $1 million of my retirement phase pension, but the $1.5 million for each child in my accumulation accounts will have to come out of super,” she said.

“This is really important when thinking about starting retirement phase pension accounts.”

Ms Steed said that if the deceased had no transfer balance account, then the child cap increment is pro-rated to their proportion of the deceased’s total benefit, and insurance proceeds can be included in the deceased’s total benefit.

“I worked with an adviser last year who had a client that was in her 40s and had a really aggressive form of Parkinson’s disease. It was terminal, but her life expectancy was still 10 years. So, she didn’t qualify under terminal illness payments, but she qualified under total and permanent disability (TPD),” Ms Steed said.

“She had $120,000 in accumulated benefits and $1 million worth of insurance. She heard about the benefits of tax-free investment returns in pension phase and she wanted to maximise her benefit, so she was going to start a TPD pension with her $120,000. Now, fortunately she went and got financial advice, because if she hadn’t, she would have started that pension for $120,000.”

Unfortunately, the client did die much sooner than anticipated, only a couple of weeks after the insurance amount was actually received in the super fund for TPD.

“Now if she had started a retirement phase pension with her $120,000, each of her two children would have only been able to start a death benefit pension for $60,000 each. They would have each had $500,000 rattling around outside of super,” she said.

“Her adviser stopped her from starting the retirement phase pension and so she just left the TPD benefit in accumulation phase and it was unrestricted non-preserved, so she could access some of that money she needed for living. But when the $1 million of insurance came in, her kids were actually able to start a death benefit pension for $550,000 each.”

Ms Steed said the big issue wasn’t so much the tax consequences of that money leaving super, but rather the control issues of that money leaving the super fund.

 

 

Miranda Brownlee
25 June 2019
smsfadviser.com

 

Pattinson Financial Services Pty Ltd ABN 17 121 851 376 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Infocus Securities Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 47 097 797 049 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 236523

Tel: +61 2 8850 6888 | Fax: +61 2 8850 6407 | Toll Free 1300 466 637 | PO Box 6253 Baulkham Hills BC NSW 2153

site By PlannerWeb