Hot Issues
spacer
Working after pension age
spacer
Does the NALI/E punishment fit the crime?
spacer
EPOA crucial for SMSFs, says professional adviser
spacer
Economic and market outlook for 2024: Global summary
spacer
Five investing tips for beginners
spacer
Setting up the next generations of retirees
spacer
A 2023 Advent Calendar for our clients
spacer
Most Expensive Wars In History
spacer
ATO takes hard line on in-house asset rules
spacer
How to budget using the 50/30/20 method
spacer
SMSFA says proposed super legislation will hit farmers, small businesses the most
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, October 2023
spacer
The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
spacer
Teaching children about the value of money
spacer
Most powerful countries throughout time.
spacer
Retirement is not just about dollars
spacer
Unfair Terms in a Standard Form Contract
spacer
Too many businesses roll the dice on tax debt: Jordan
spacer
Revised NALE rules ‘miss chance to clarify SMSF bugbear
spacer
6 simple rules will ensure a deed can be executed in all states
spacer
Our investment and economic outlook, September 2023
spacer
The benefits and risks of collectable super assets
spacer
High deposit rates, but the case for equities is strong
spacer
Most powerful LEADERS of All Time
spacer
Single-asset segregation barred
spacer
Intergenerational Report 2023
spacer
Transferring wealth to the next generation
spacer
Investment and economic outlook, August 2023
spacer
Managing complex relationships in SMSFs comes down to well-crafted deeds
spacer
Last chance for $25,000 super deduction
spacer
Super gender divide to remain a challenge
spacer
Oldest Buildings in the World
Managing complex relationships in SMSFs comes down to well-crafted deeds

Marriage breakdowns and SMSFs are tricky and expensive, but if the fund has extended family members included it can get even trickier, says the head of a national SMSF advice company.

 
 

.

Aaron Dunn, CEO and founder of Smarter SMSF, said on the latest SMSF Adviser podcast that it’s not uncommon to see SMSFs set up with siblings or business partners for which the law does not provide any mechanism for individuals to unpack and depart in the event of a dispute.

“There are mechanisms within the superannuation law and Family Law Act that deal with marital breakdown even though that can still become quite tricky,” he said.

“When a dispute arises, and one party is accusing another and that party is accusing the other person, they’re in a fairly expensive battle to try and resolve a pathway out.

 

“But the fact is, the regulations require someone to provide consent to be able to leave. You can’t boot someone out or they can’t say they want to leave and absolve all their responsibilities.

“What you have to always remember with an SMSF is when you come into the fund, for the large part, you are equally a member and a trustee or director, so you have responsibilities that you need to adhere to as well.”

Mr Dunn said when establishing an SMSF with either extended family or business partners, consideration should be given to including some type of conditional-based membership.

“You can put in place a condition that would, in essence, say to the person that’s coming in, you accept and acknowledge that they will do the right thing, or they will no longer be there,” he said.

“But by and large, that doesn’t exist, and therefore, navigating a pathway out becomes a hell of a lot trickier than it would in a husband-and-wife situation where you can go down the various ways of separation agreements and court orders.”

Marriage breakdowns and the splitting of an SMSF and assets in general is a fairly common occurrence, he said, and although it can be done, there can still be problems that arise.

However, if the SMSF also includes siblings or business partners, those problems become more complex.

“One of the things which I often talk about is documentation and my understanding is that if something is in the deed [to cover a situation like this], it makes it a lot easier,” he said.

“But it has to be done in the deed. This is something that we’re getting better at as an industry, but if we have a corporate trustee, we’re not only needing to consider the deed, but we’ve got to consider the company.

“The constitution that governs that is very different. Quite often, I come across scenarios where there’s an inconsistency because we might have had upgrades to the deed, but the requirements of the constitution are very different.

“Therefore, the actions that you thought might have been happening in the deed are irrelevant because of the corporate trustee structure.

“So, we’re looking at shareholders and directors as opposed to individual trustees.”

Mr Dunn said it’s imperative that the deed is always kept up to date and advisers start from an outcomes basis and manage all the risks for their clients.

“Where relevant, you might need to tailor parts of the documentation, and I use that term quite broadly, to ensure that you manage the risks of those relationships that might exist within the fund above and beyond a normal husband and wife or partner situation,” he said.

“Because when they seem to blow up, they usually blow up pretty hard, and it gets very, very ugly.”

 

 

 

 

Keeli Cambourne
29 August 2023
smsfadviser.com

Pattinson Financial Services Pty Ltd ABN 17 121 851 376 is a Corporate Authorised Representative of Infocus Securities Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 47 097 797 049 AFSL and Australian Credit Licence No. 236523

Tel: +61 2 8850 6888 | Fax: +61 2 8850 6407 | Toll Free 1300 466 637 | PO Box 6253 Baulkham Hills BC NSW 2153

site By PlannerWeb